Contractors & Freelancers: Pros & Cons

   By Gonzalo López Martí  – Creative director, etc. / LMMiami.com

Welcome to the third installment of a trilogy -or maybe a tetralogy- that will attempt a detailed SWOT analysis of the various paths a marketer can choose when hiring talent to roll out its communication campaigns. The first installment two weeks ago addressed the various strengths, weaknesses, opportunities & threats of using in-house agencies* for such purposes. Last week the topic was conventional agencies** (conventional as in Madison Avenue-style shops).

  • Today: independent contractors & freelancers.
  • A little recap: in-house agencies can be notoriously toothless but they also are, at least in appearance, thrifty, focused and efficient.
  • In comparison, retaining an external autonomous shop can be plenty onerous.
  • Particularly if we’re talking about one of the majors: Omnicom, WPP, Publicis and their assorted underlings.
  • 7 figures for a ten slide-long PowerPoint deck?!?!
  • Yup.
  • You are paying a premium though because retaining an agency with a marquee brand name also comes with an unwritten insurance policy: it gives you the peace of mind to protect your rear end if your campaigns do not deliver.
  • “Hey, don’t look at me. I’m only the CMO here! I hired the legendary Bentom Bontom & Bintom. It ain’t my fault if nobody’s buying our new & improved glow-in-the-dark toothpaste…”
  • The other good thing about a conventional agency is, possibly, candor.
  • You are not their only client, their livelihood is not solely dependent on you, they should be more willing to tell you the truth, sans sugarcoating, warts and all.
  • In this context, a freelancer can be a happy medium.
  • At least in theory.
  • If you hire a freelance slash contractor who has worked for large agencies in the past you’ll get Madison Avenue work at Jersey City prices.
  • Needless to say, a freelancer/contractor doesn’t carry the weight of a large global network but he/she has a certain level of freedom and autonomy that awards them a modicum of independence to “speak truth to power”.
  • Other advantages:
  • You’ll compensate them on a project basis.
  • Usually by the hour.
  • No long-term retainer fee schemes.
  • No belaboring over painstakingly lawyerly SOW contracts.
  • You get what you pay for at face value.
  • No paid maternity leave o vacations.
  • No benefits.
  • No strings attached.
  • Once the project is finished the contractor goes his/her merry way.
  • They call it “the gig economy” for a reason.
  • These days, there are various Ubers of freelancers out there.
  • Yandiki.com, for instance, defines itself as “creative talent in the cloud. Your global talent pool. Without Risk. Without Walls. Without Limits.”
  • Fiverr.com is also pretty popular (and hated too).
  • TheIdealists.com: “the IdeaLists gives you access to a curated group of creative marketing professionals, ready to tackle any project.”
  • Jovoto.com
  • DesignCrowd.com
  • Freelancer.com
  • oDesk.com
  • elance.com
  • The list grows by the day.

* In-House Agencies: Pros & Cons
https://hispanicad.com/agency/business/house-agencies-pros-cons

** Conventional Agencies: Pros & Cons
https://hispanicad.comagency/business/conventional-agencies-pros-cons

 

 

Skip to content